Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Furio Development Team Make Insane Price Changes and Piss Off All Their Investors

Cryptocurrency, DeFi to be precise, was meant to take power away from the rich and give it back to the poor. Decentralised Finance (DeFi) was meant to be, well, decentralised. No centralised entity was meant to control the platform(s).

So as you can imagine, I was incredibly shocked when I logged on to compound my daily earnings to discover the price had plunged from around $4.50-$5.50 per FUR token to below $1.00.

What the f*ck happened?

As I researched the crash I discovered it wasn’t due to a massive sell-off.

No, the Furio devs decided it would be great to lower the price to “save” the project. Potentially having the opposite effect, as investors saw the price drop and panic sold their bags.

WTF is this crap?

Now, if you’re wondering what the hell Furio is, let me tell you.

Furio is a high-risk/high-reward daily ROI app where you can earn between 0.5–2.5% daily return in the native FUR token.

Now, before you tell me how unsustainable that is, let me explain how this project became sustainable.

The Furio team have given us investors a crash course in sustainability.

  • First, you create a project with a “stable” coin price between $4.50–5.50.
  • Second, you lure investors to your project with promises of riches.
  • Third, you adjust the contract when you realise it is not sustainable to try and save the project.
  • Four, you run with your profits and leave the project to die.

Jokes aside, step four hasn’t happened. And I don’t think it will either, I’m not FUDDING my own bag, let me explain.

Furio devs made the tough decision to try and save the project by reducing the price. Yes, that sucks. They shouldn’t have the ability to change the price. They are planning on making the contract immutable. Until that point, Furio is centralized IMO.

This price adjustment was undoubtedly a tough decision, but the right one.

It was much better than the other two options that Furio stated:

  • 1: Freeze the contracts
  • 2: Carry on “as is” and watch the LMS get abused to zero

And I believe that this decision will help Furio become great once again. I will take the short-term loss, for those long-term (potential) gains.

The aftermath

Look, a lot of people were pissed when their FUR portfolio’s devalued by 78% overnight. Then add this comment from the Furio dev team onto the raging fire pit:

Since the issues with FTX and the pressures this has created, we have been staggered by the immaturity of certain members of the DeFi community.”

Then you’ve got a recipe for a very, very pissed-off community.

The Furio team should have taken responsibility for their actions instead of passing them off to the community and the market/FTX situation. Maybe they missed the memo about “the customer is king”? Anyway, once the dust had settled the dev had a chance to explain why this change had been made.

The project was getting rinsed to the tune of around $80,000 daily. With $2.4 million remaining in the LMS funds pool, the contract would have been emptied in less than a month. Everyone saw the contract being drained and followed suit like lemmings jumping off a cliff. So understandably, the devs had to take the initiative and change the contract/price to save the project. IMO that’s better than pulling the rug.

Speak the truth

Honestly, I’m unsure about this project. I’ve lost some trust as the devs keep on changing the contract. This is the kind of foul play that shouldn’t exist in DeFi. Yet, it is for a reason. So to regain the trust of the community, the devs should:

  • Guarantee that the LMS will stay in the new range of $0.90-$1.10
  • Involve the community in major decisions
  • Don’t set release dates for new projects until they are 99% ready to launch

Losing money is bad enough. It’s much worse when the investors lose confidence in the project. Angry investors spread bad news, and bad news is bad for business.

Time to move on

Humans hate change. They hate them even more, when there’s money at risk. These changes sucked for every single Furio investor. But on the bright side. If they had kept the price, the project would have died before Christmas hit. Then everyone would suffer huge losses without being able to scrape back some earnings. This change has allowed us to keep earning interest on our investments.

Furio devs could have let the project die and run off to start a new project. Instead, they stuck around to try and save the project and give it a future: a tough decision, no doubt.

There is a silver lining. You must look past the short-term losses and embrace the potential long-term gains.

Not financial advice. DYOR, don’t listen to random people online.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Norway’s Wealth Fund Watchdog to Review Cryptocurrencies by 2025

    According to market news reported by , the supervisory authority of Norway's wealth fund will conduct reviews on shoe manufacturers, cryptocurrency, and gambling companies in 2025, which may lead to divestment.

  • SlowMist publishes over 4,000 DEXX victim addresses and corresponding attacker addresses on the EVM chain

    Yu Xian disclosed that SlowMist has published the addresses of more than 4000 victims and corresponding attacker addresses on the EVM (ETH/BSC/BASE) chain's DEXX. Last week, more than 8600 Solana addresses related to attackers were announced. The data comes from the official DEXX and submissions from thousands of victims.

  • OpenAI responds to Musk's lawsuit: The application is repeated and still unfounded

    recently Musk requested a US court to block OpenAI, an artificial intelligence research center, from illegally transforming into a for-profit enterprise. A spokesperson for OpenAI said that Musk's application is repetitive and still baseless.

  • Musk says SpaceX could be worth more than $1 trillion

    a netizen posted on social media platform X claiming that there are 9 companies in the world with a market value exceeding one trillion US dollars, of which 8 are American companies. In response, Musk replied that SpaceX may one day become one of them.

  • South Korea postpones cryptocurrency tax again until 2027

    at today's press conference, Park Chan-dae, the leader of the largest opposition party in South Korea, the Democratic Party of Korea, announced that they will abandon their plan to implement a cryptocurrency capital gains tax in 2025 and agree to postpone it for another two years until 2027. The proposal to "delay the cryptocurrency capital gains tax" was put forward by the South Korean government and the ruling party, the People Power Party. The Democratic Party of Korea previously stated that delaying taxation was a political trick of the ruling party.

  • Community feedback: On-chain AI agent Spectral interaction contract was hacked

    On December 1st, X user @RuslanMoody warned: "Do not interact with the on-chain AI agent Spectral website, as its interaction contract has been hacked. Note: this does not apply to tokens whose liquidity is locked on Uniswap." Additionally, X user @0xYong_W stated that the Spectral exchange has been "emptied" by someone else.

  • Japan's Financial Services Agency proposes relaxing reserve requirements for trust banks to issue stablecoins and implementing travel rules

    the Japanese Financial Services Agency (FSA) recently presented some ideas regarding cryptocurrencies and stablecoins to the Financial System Committee's Payment Services Working Group. It was mentioned that the FSA is unwilling to allow banks outside of trust banks to issue stablecoins. As for stablecoins issued by trust banks, the FSA hopes to relax the reserve requirements that currently mandate all assets be held in the form of bank deposits. However, the FSA also hopes to implement travel rules that require KYC for transfers of stablecoins issued by trust banks.

  • Security agency: Clipper lost more than $500,000 in attack, $6.5 million in funds at risk

    security organization fuzzland's co-founder shoucccc stated in a post on X that "DEX Clipper was attacked by hackers due to API vulnerabilities (such as private key leaks). Currently, the losses exceed 500,000 US dollars, and 6.5 million US dollars of funds are at risk. Users are advised to withdraw immediately."

  • ZachXBT: Suspected insiders made $3.8 million in profits on RTR

    On August 10th, Chain Detective ZachXBT posted on social media that 4 addresses made a profit of $3.8 million in the RTR sell-off, with the 9G1ELG and GHoW2 addresses belonging to the same person and receiving 500 SOL in new funds within minutes after the TGE. Previously, it was reported that Restore The Republic (RTR) had its TGE on the evening of August 8th, with rumors circulating in the community that it was related to a new project by the Trump family. The RTR token reached a high of $0.156 on August 9th at midnight. Afterwards, Eric Trump, the current Executive Vice President of the Trump Organization and son of Donald Trump, warned on social media to "be careful of false tokens" and that the only official Trump project has yet to be announced and will be announced on Twitter first. After the statement was released, RTR quickly dropped by about 95%, with a trading volume of $164 million within just 15 hours of its creation.

  • The U.S. Internal Revenue Service has released a new draft of the crypto tax form, which no longer requires filling in wallet addresses and transaction IDs

    The US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released an updated draft version of tax form 1099-DA for cryptocurrency brokers and investors to report certain transaction income. The public has 30 days to provide feedback to the IRS on this version. Starting in 2026, cryptocurrency investors who use brokers (currently mainly Coinbase and Kraken, among others) will receive 1099-DAs from these brokers to report certain cryptocurrency sales and trades as taxable events to the IRS. IRS officials say this form will "bring more convenience and clarity" to users who pay US cryptocurrency taxes.