Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

ConsenSys: Cross-Chain Interoperability Is the Future of DeFi

Validated Project

One of the key factors hindering mass adoption of blockchain technology and Web3 today is its siloed nature. While users of one independent blockchain, say Ethereum, can seamlessly interact with the decentralized applications built on that particular blockchain—communicating with other blockchains, say Polkadot or Avalanche, is still difficult. As a result, users are forced to split their liquidity among different chains, while developers ineffectively spend time and resources on these separate chains.

One way that users currently interact among different blockchains is by swapping tokens through centralized exchanges (CEXs). CEXs operate much like a traditional stock exchange, where they facilitate buy and sell orders between different users. Say a user with MATIC, Polygon’s native token, wants to participate in DeFi on Ethereum. They will be unable to do so unless they go on a CEX, and exchange their MATIC for ETH. This is a time-consuming and cumbersome process, and users lose money in the gas fees. 

By acting as a third-party custodian to a user’s funds, CEXs defeat the purpose of decentralization, which is crucial to the ethos of Web3 and blockchain. The recent bankruptcy of FTX, the world’s second-largest crypto exchange, and the subsequent losses that customers are facing clearly delineates the dangers of handing over controls of your crypto deposits to a centralized entity. 

This is where cross-chain interoperability enters the conversation. It gives users and developers the freedom to choose how they want to interact with DeFi, without being constrained by the rules, and related assets of any one network. Let’s dive into what it means, why it is important for DeFi and its applications currently available.

What Is Cross-chain Interoperability?

To understand cross-chain interoperability, we need to first understand why two blockchains cannot interact with each other. A blockchain is essentially a shared ledger that keeps an immutable track of transactions that its users post. For two separate blockchains to share data amongst each other would require for those chains to agree on a single state for the blockchains and keep an immutable track of every subsequent transaction on the other. The amount of data that will need to be exchanged and stored for the two blockchains for this process makes it difficult to scale. And imagine doing this for each blockchain pair that wishes to interact with each other!

Cross-chain interoperability solves this problem by allowing different blockchains to exchange data and value. It essentially acts as a bridge between two blockchains, eliminating the need for a third-party intermediary like a CEX. 

Why Is Cross-chain Interoperability Important for DeFi?

The DeFi ecosystem today is worth $40.82B, of which Ethereum accounts for nearly 58%. However, in a world where blockchain interoperability does not exist, users of non-Ethereum blockchains such as Polygon and Avalanche cannot participate in the value being created in the largest DeFi ecosystem. Think of every DeFi ecosystem as a separate economy, but those economies would not scale massively if they are unable to interact with each other. 

Cross-chain interoperability can lead to a wider adoption of DeFi. By allowing users to freely access DeFi protocols across blockchain networks, it will create more value for them to interact with DeFi. This ease of access can, in turn, bring in more users to Web3 and DeFi. More users then lead to greater amounts of liquidity flowing into the DeFi ecosystem, allowing for larger lending, staking, yield farming, and borrowing operations. 

Cross-chain interoperability also allows users to transcend the various limitations of individual blockchains; they now do not have to be limited by Ethereum’s higher gas fees, and other network’s fewer users and low liquidity. Developers too can create primitives that allow digital assets to be transferred across multiple chains. 

Interoperability Mechanisms

Cross-chain Bridges

True to their name, cross-chain bridges act as a gateway of exchange for data and assets between two different blockchains. They allow this exchange by locking an asset on one network, and minting a synthetic version of that asset on the destination blockchain. 

For example, if a user wants to swap ETH for Polygon’s MATIC, a wrapped version of ETH compatible with the Polygon network will be created and sent to the user’s wallet. This ETH gets locked in a smart contract on Ethereum network and will always be equal to the amount of wrapped MATIC created. Upon bridging back, the wrapped MATIC is burnt and the unlocked ETH is put back into circulation. 

MetaMask, the most popular crypto wallet, has recently launched a beta version of its bridging aggregator service. Called MetaMask Bridges, it helps a user find the best way to move their assets from one chain to another. Currently, it supports transfers of up to $10,000 across four EVM networks: Ethereum, Binance Smart Chain, Polygon and Avalanche. MetaMask Bridges vets third-party bridges it integrates with to ensure the process does not compromise on security and decentralization. 

Cross-chain Trading Through DEXs

Users can also swap tokens through decentralized exchanges (DEX) using a mechanism called atomic swaps. Atomic swaps is a trustless peer-to-peer exchange method that is facilitated by smart contracts between two individual wallets. 

Atomic swaps utilize the hashed timelock contract (HTLC), which sets a deadline for the transaction to be completed. For a successful swap to occur, both parties need to provide cryptographic proof that they have the assets they are looking to exchange. The HTLC smart contract ensures that if either of the parties does not provide the proof within a pre-decided timeframe, the digital assets will be returned to the original wallets.

Interoperability Blockchains

A third, and probably most effective, way to enable cross-chain interoperability is through inter-blockchain communications (IBC) protocols. IBC allows independent blockchains to exchange data and assets directly, using smart contracts deployed on each of those chains. Currently, IBC is mainly used by the blockchains in the Cosmos ecosystem, which aims to build an internet of blockchains.

Another protocol that uses IBC is LayerZero. It aims to act as a base layer underpinning all blockchains, whether Layer1s or Layer2s, to allow different blockchains to communicate with one another. 

Cross-chain Interoperability Risks

While there has been progress in enabling the flow of value across separate blockchains, some limitations remain. 

For example, bridging is a complex mechanism since it navigates two completely separate blockchain ecosystems, built using different programming languages. This complexity creates opportunities for hacks and exploits. Vitalik Buterin has also expressed his reservations about bridging because of their security limitations.

Another vulnerability of the bridging process is the fact that it creates large asset pools locked in a single contract on one chain. This pooling of assets creates a centralized point of failure that hackers can then potentially attack. Bridging hacks account for 69% of all crypto funds stolen in 2022, according to data analytics firm Chainanalysis. Atomic swaps, on the other hand, can be cumbersome and require a user to undergo multiple steps in the process. 

Conclusion

Despite the risks present in cross-chain interoperability mechanisms available today, they remain popular because they allow users to access the promise of DeFi and Web3 at lower costs and higher speed. 

One way for organizations to access DeFi and cross-chain bridges is through MetaMask Institutional (MMI), the institution-compliant version of MetaMask. MMI provides organizations the widest access across EVM-compatible protocols. While MMI offers access to all EVM blockchains and Layer2s, an organization’s access to these is determined by the EVM chains supported by their chosen custodian.

MMI also offers reporting features such as snapshots and transaction notes on 13 EVM chains. Only MMI provides unrivaled access to DeFi without compromising on institution-required security, operational efficiency, or compliance requirements.The implosion of the centralized crypto exchange FTX has woken up users to the importance of DeFi. In the week preceding November 15th, many DeFi protocols registered “double-digit percentage growth in users and transactions”, according to data analytics firm Nansen. As more users flock to DeFi, cross-chain interoperability emerges as the natural focus to ensure they get the most value out of their digital assets.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Judge again rejects Musk's high compensation plan, Tesla to appeal

    a Delaware judge has once again rejected Musk's high salary plan at Tesla. Tesla's official social media responded to this by stating that the court's ruling was incorrect and that they will appeal. If this ruling is not overturned, it means that the judge and plaintiff's lawyers are managing Delaware companies rather than their legitimate owners - shareholders.

  • Norway’s Wealth Fund Watchdog to Review Cryptocurrencies by 2025

    According to market news reported by , the supervisory authority of Norway's wealth fund will conduct reviews on shoe manufacturers, cryptocurrency, and gambling companies in 2025, which may lead to divestment.

  • SlowMist publishes over 4,000 DEXX victim addresses and corresponding attacker addresses on the EVM chain

    Yu Xian disclosed that SlowMist has published the addresses of more than 4000 victims and corresponding attacker addresses on the EVM (ETH/BSC/BASE) chain's DEXX. Last week, more than 8600 Solana addresses related to attackers were announced. The data comes from the official DEXX and submissions from thousands of victims.

  • OpenAI responds to Musk's lawsuit: The application is repeated and still unfounded

    recently Musk requested a US court to block OpenAI, an artificial intelligence research center, from illegally transforming into a for-profit enterprise. A spokesperson for OpenAI said that Musk's application is repetitive and still baseless.

  • Musk says SpaceX could be worth more than $1 trillion

    a netizen posted on social media platform X claiming that there are 9 companies in the world with a market value exceeding one trillion US dollars, of which 8 are American companies. In response, Musk replied that SpaceX may one day become one of them.

  • South Korea postpones cryptocurrency tax again until 2027

    at today's press conference, Park Chan-dae, the leader of the largest opposition party in South Korea, the Democratic Party of Korea, announced that they will abandon their plan to implement a cryptocurrency capital gains tax in 2025 and agree to postpone it for another two years until 2027. The proposal to "delay the cryptocurrency capital gains tax" was put forward by the South Korean government and the ruling party, the People Power Party. The Democratic Party of Korea previously stated that delaying taxation was a political trick of the ruling party.

  • Community feedback: On-chain AI agent Spectral interaction contract was hacked

    On December 1st, X user @RuslanMoody warned: "Do not interact with the on-chain AI agent Spectral website, as its interaction contract has been hacked. Note: this does not apply to tokens whose liquidity is locked on Uniswap." Additionally, X user @0xYong_W stated that the Spectral exchange has been "emptied" by someone else.

  • Japan's Financial Services Agency proposes relaxing reserve requirements for trust banks to issue stablecoins and implementing travel rules

    the Japanese Financial Services Agency (FSA) recently presented some ideas regarding cryptocurrencies and stablecoins to the Financial System Committee's Payment Services Working Group. It was mentioned that the FSA is unwilling to allow banks outside of trust banks to issue stablecoins. As for stablecoins issued by trust banks, the FSA hopes to relax the reserve requirements that currently mandate all assets be held in the form of bank deposits. However, the FSA also hopes to implement travel rules that require KYC for transfers of stablecoins issued by trust banks.

  • Security agency: Clipper lost more than $500,000 in attack, $6.5 million in funds at risk

    security organization fuzzland's co-founder shoucccc stated in a post on X that "DEX Clipper was attacked by hackers due to API vulnerabilities (such as private key leaks). Currently, the losses exceed 500,000 US dollars, and 6.5 million US dollars of funds are at risk. Users are advised to withdraw immediately."

  • MarbleX and Netmarble Launch $20 Million Ecosystem Promotion Plan

    Ethereum game platform Immutable has announced a partnership with the blockchain game division Marblex of South Korean gaming giant Netmarble. The collaboration will migrate Marblex's ecosystem and its multiple games from the Klaytn blockchain to the Ethereum Layer 2 network Immutable zkEVM. The games include "Ni no Kuni: Cross Worlds", "A3: Still Alive" and "Meta World: My City", and the two parties will also launch an "ecosystem promotion plan" to provide up to $20 million in support to developers to attract new games to join Marblex and Immutable. It is currently unclear whether the Immutable migration will affect Saga's plans, and the project representatives have not commented on the issue.