Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Hong Kong Embraces Cryptocurrency: Get Ready for New VASP Regime

Cointime Official

BY Hauzen)Hauzen LLP is a Hong Kong law firm that was established in 2017 to meet the specialist legal needs of participants in the complex financial markets of Hong Kong. Our lawyers include seasoned regulatory, disputes and corporate lawyers with backgrounds in business and management – we deploy our knowledge and experience in legal and business matters to achieve pragmatic outcomes for clients.

Any person who seeks to carry on a virtual asset service business will soon need to obtain a Virtual Asset Service Provider (“VASP”) licence from the Securities Futures Commission (“SFC”), failing which he commits an offence. Under the current licensing regime, pending implementation of the new rules described below, only two crypto platforms, i.e. OSL Digital Securities Limited and Hash Blockchain Limited, have been licensed as cryptocurrency exchanges in Hong Kong – they will need to transition to the new regulatory regime within the prescribed transition period.

Recent History of the Legislation

The implementing legislation for the VASP scheme, currently in the form of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing (Amendment) Ordinance 2022 (the “Ordinance”) specified that the licensing regime for virtual asset services would come into operation on 1 March 2023. After consultation with the regulators in Hong Kong, the Hong Kong government decided to move the effective date of the new law to 1 June 2023. Mr. Joseph Chan, Undersecretary for the Financial Services and Treasury Bureau (“FSTB”) told the South China Morning Post that “after listening to the feedback of the Hong Kong Association of Banks and other regulators, we decide to implement the effective date of the law change for the virtual asset licensing regime to be moved to 1 June 2023. This will allow more time for the industry to have sufficient time to prepare to comply with the new regulatory requirements.”

What are virtual assets?

Virtual assets (“VAs”) under the Ordinance mean cryptographically-secured digital representations of value, expressed as a unit of account or store of economic value and either is used, or is intended to be used, as a medium of exchange accepted by the public, for payment for goods or services, discharge of a debt, or investment; or provides rights, eligibility or access to vote on the management, administration or governance of the affairs in connection with, or to vote on any change of the terms of any arrangement applicable to, any cryptographically secured digital representation of value; and can be transferred, stored or traded electronically.

The Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury may also prescribe any digital representation of value as a VA.

Under the proposed new section 53ZRA(2) of the Ordinance, the definition of VA excludes digital representations of fiat currencies issued by central banks or issued by the government; limited purpose digital token; or constitutes securities and a futures contract, etc.

There was much discussion in the industry on the definition of a “limited purpose digital token”. It has been suggested that some non-fungible tokens offered in the current market might be excluded. Upon the gazettal of the Ordinance, s.53ZR clarifies that any digital representation of value that is similar to a customer loyalty or reward point or an in-game asset and it is not intended by the issuer to be convertible into money or another medium of exchange accepted by the public is a “limited purpose digital token”. The Bills Committee notes that “non-fungible tokens” (“NFTs”) in general are unique cryptographic tokens that exist on a blockchain which cannot be replicated, and some NFTs are not intended by the issuer to be convertible into money or another medium of exchange accepted by the public. A NFT that is a digital representation of a collectible is unlikely to qualify as a VA.

What are virtual asset services?

Any person seeking to carry on virtual asset services will be required to obtain a VASP licence from the SFC (s. 53ZRD of the Ordinance). Schedule 3B of the Ordinance sets out the meaning of a VA service. A VA service means operating a VA exchange – that is, providing services through means of electronic facilities where the users will enter into binding transactions for buying or purchasing VAs, and where the users’ money or VAs will directly or indirectly come into possession of the VASP service provider. A person providing such VA services is required to obtain a VASP licence from the SFC.

Requirements for obtaining a VASP licence

An applicant for a VASP licence, its responsible officers, licensed representatives, directors and ultimate owners will be required to satisfy the fit and proper test (see Fit and Proper Guidelines published by the SFC). The VASP applicant is required to appoint at least two responsible officers who will generally be responsible for overseeing the operation of the licensed VASP and ensuring compliance with the legislation and other regulatory requirements. The requirements for the responsible officers of VASPs mirror those for the responsible officers of licensed corporation under the SFO and require that:

  • At least one responsible officer must be an executive director of the VASP applicant;
  • If the VASP applicant has more than one executive director, they must all be appointed as responsible officers;
  • At least one responsible officer must be ordinarily resident in Hong Kong; and
  • At least one responsible officer must be available at all times to supervise the business of the VASP service.

Hong Kong-incorporated companies which have a permanent place of business in Hong Kong and non-Hong Kong companies registered under the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 622) will be eligible to be licensed as VASPs. Businesses without a separate legal personality (such as partnerships and sole traders), individuals and overseas companies that are not registered in Hong Kong will not be able to obtain a VASP licence.

Emphasis on Investor Protection

According to the Legislative Council Brief published by the FSTB, VASP licensing applicants will be required to abide by a robust set of regulatory requirements to be imposed as licensing conditions by the SFC. Investor protection will include but not be limited to:

  • consideration of VASP licensing applicants’ company and management structure;
  • that the business model is sound, with detailed risk management policies and other listing and counter-market manipulation measures in place; and
  • VASP licensing applicants must demonstrate that they have adequate financial resources (a minimum amount has not yet been specified). At the initial stage of the licensing regime (unspecified in duration), a licensed VASP may only offer services to professional investors. Imposing this requirement as licensing condition provides flexibility for the SFC to make changes when adjustment is necessary without the need to amend the Ordinance.

In January 2022, the SFC and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (Hong Kong’s bank regulator) (“HKMA”) published a joint circular on intermediaries’ virtual asset-related activities. The circular demonstrated a differentiated approach to regulating VA related activities by the SFC and the HKMA, and specifies different requirements for the following categories of VA-related activities: product distribution, provision of dealing services, and provision of advisory services.

For example, in relation to product distribution, complex VA products may only be offered to professional investors, and intermediaries are in general required to make an assessment as to whether the client has sufficient knowledge of and experience with VA-related products before trading on their behalf. An exception to this rule is where the client is an institutional professional investor or a qualified corporate professional investor. The circular provided exceptions for exchange-traded VA derivative products that are traded on a specified exchange, and public futures-based VA ETF authorised or approved in a designated jurisdiction for offering to retail investors by the respective regulator and traded on a specified exchange – the professional investors only restriction does not apply to the distribution of these products.

SFC’s supervisory powers and sanctions

The SFC will be granted extensive supervisory and intervention powers including the power to:-

  • enter business premises of licensed VASPs and associated entities to conduct routine inspections and request production of documents;
  • investigate non-compliance;
  • impose administrative sanctions (including reprimands, remedial actions orders, civil penalties and suspension or revocation of licences) in case of non-compliance; and
  • impose restrictions and prohibitions against the operation of a licensed VASP and its associated entities where the circumstances so warrant.

Operating a VA exchange in Hong Kong without a licence, or actively marketing (whether in Hong Kong or elsewhere) to the public of Hong Kong the services of an overseas VA exchange that is not licensed in Hong Kong, without a reasonable excuse, will be an offence punishable on conviction on indictment, to a fine of HK$5 million and to imprisonment for seven years and, in the case of a continuing offence, to a further fine of HK$100,000 for every day during which the offence continues. A summary conviction will see fines of HK$500,000 and imprisonment of up to two years, and a further fine of HK$10,000 for every day during which the offence continues.

Implementation timeline

The following is the currently-expected timeline for the new VASP regulatory regime.

What should you start doing now if you want to operate a VASP in Hong Kong?

  1. Appoint Responsible Officers for AML/CFT compliance, as each VASP applicant is required to have at least two responsible officers to oversee the operation of the licensed VASP and ensure compliance with AML/CTF and other regulatory requirements.
  2. Develop internal anti-money laundering policies, procedures and controls – including risk assessments, customer due diligence measures (i.e. know your client requirements), ongoing monitoring of customers, suspicious transactions reporting, record keeping, and sufficient staff training on the regulatory requirements.
Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Equation News calls out Binance for "insider trading": You are destroying the sentiment of the trading market

    On November 25th, Formula News reported that to those insider traders who participated in the listing of Binance perpetual contracts, please slow down when selling your chips next time. The WHY and CHEEMS crashes you caused resulted in a 100% negative return for everyone involved in the trade, and you are destroying the emotions of the trade. Earlier today, Binance announced the listing of 1000WHYUSDT and 1000CHEEMSUSDT perpetual contracts, which caused a short-term crash in WHY and CHEEMS and sparked intense discussion within the community.

  • U.S. Congressman Mike Flood: Looking forward to working with the next SEC Chairman to revoke the anti-crypto banking policy SAB 121

     US House of Representatives will investigate Representative Mike Flood's recent statement: "Despite widespread opposition, SAB 121 is still operating as a regulation, even though it has never gone through the normal Administrative Procedure Act process." Flood said, "I look forward to working with the next SEC chairman to revoke SAB 121. Whether Chairman Gary Gensler resigns on his own or President Trump fulfills his promise to dismiss Gensler, the new government has an excellent opportunity to usher in a new era after Gensler's departure." He added, "It's not surprising that Gensler opposed the digital asset regulatory framework passed by the House on a bipartisan basis earlier this year. 71 Democrats and House Republicans passed this common-sense framework together. Although the Democratic-led Senate rejected it, it represented a breakthrough moment for cryptocurrency and may provide information for the work of the unified Republican government when the next Congress begins in January next year."

  • Indian billionaire Adani summoned by US SEC to explain position on bribery case

    Indian billionaire Gautam Adani and his nephew, Sahil Adani, have been subpoenaed by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to explain allegations of paying over $250 million in bribes to win solar power contracts. According to the Press Trust of India (PTI), the subpoena has been delivered to the Adani family's residence in Ahmedabad, a city in western India, and they have been given 21 days to respond. The notice, issued on November 21 by the Eastern District Court of New York, states that if the Adani family fails to respond on time, a default judgment will be made against them.

  • U.S. Congressman: SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce may become the new acting chairman of the SEC

    US Congressman French Hill revealed at the North American Blockchain Summit (NABS) that Republican SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce is "likely" to become the new acting chair of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). He noted that current chair Gary Gensler will step down on January 20, 2025, and the Republican Party will take over the SEC, with Peirce expected to succeed him.

  • Tether spokesperson: The relationship with Cantor is purely business, and the claim that Lutnick influenced regulatory actions is pure nonsense

     a spokesperson for Tether stated: "The relationship between Tether and Cantor Fitzgerald is purely a business relationship based on managing reserves. Claims that Howard Lutnick's joining the transition team in some way implies an influence on regulatory actions are baseless."

  • Bitwise CEO warns that ETHW is not suitable for all investors and has high risks and high volatility

    Hunter Horsley, CEO of Bitwise, posted on X platform that he was happy to see capital inflows into Bitwise's Ethereum exchange-traded fund ETHW, iShares, and Fidelity this Friday. He reminded that ETHW is not a registered investment company under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940 and therefore is not protected by the law. ETHW is not suitable for all investors due to its high risk and volatility.

  • Cointime July 27th News Express

    1. As of July 25, BlackRock IBIT held more than 338,000 bitcoins, an increase of more than 1,092 bitcoins from the previous day.

  • Hong Kong's financial industry may study launching stablecoin trading desks and institutional custody services

    Hong Kong Monetary Authority recently announced the list of participants in the stablecoin issuer sandbox, including JD Coin Chain, Circle Coin Innovation, Standard Chartered Bank, Anni Group, Hong Kong Telecom and other institutions. Research reports released by Zeng Shengjun, a researcher at the Greater Bay Area Financial Research Institute of the Shenzhen Branch of Bank of China, and Guan Zhenqiu, a researcher at the Hong Kong Financial Research Institute of Bank of China, analyzed that the Hong Kong dollar stablecoin can improve the efficiency and inclusiveness of the Hong Kong financial system. Its stability, free convertibility, high security, high open source and cross-border mobility can provide support for a wider range of financial innovations.

  • Hong Kong Legislative Council Member: The issuance and trading system of tokenized bond-related products can be shared with the mainland

    Hong Kong Legislative Council member Chan Chun-ying stated that the new productivity of Hong Kong's financial industry is currently mainly developed around digital and green themes. Regarding virtual assets, Hong Kong regulatory agencies should establish relevant trading platforms, stablecoin issuances, testing and operational mechanisms, capture digital development trends, and share relevant regulatory experience with the mainland. At the same time, Hong Kong's tokenized bond development is leading the world, and relevant product issuances, trading systems can be shared with the mainland or guide more mainland companies to issue, together meeting international market demand.

  • Hong Kong investment in virtual assets will not be subject to capital gains tax

    Hong Kong investors in virtual assets will not be subject to asset value-added tax, which is a very attractive point for global investors. For example, in Japan and Australia, although they have expanded the virtual asset market earlier than Hong Kong, they still need to pay asset value-added tax, which will be included in the comprehensive tax rate calculation. The comprehensive tax rates in Japan and Australia can be as high as 50% and 40% respectively. For investors, investment returns are of course the most important consideration, and Hong Kong's low tax system will attract more international investors to settle in Hong Kong.