Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Crypto Anno 2022 — With Perspectives From Matt Levine, Vitalik Buterin and Rune Christensen

Cointime Official

by FuturisticLawyer

Matt Levine’s take

In late October, a highly regarded financial journalist, Matt Levine, published “The Crypto Story”, a cover-to-cover issue of Bloomberg Businessweek detailing “where it [crypto] came from, what it all means, and why it still matters.” As the editor, Joel Weber writes in the preface:

“(..) crypto has dug itself into finance, into technology, and into our heads. And if crypto isn’t going away, we’d better attempt to understand it.”

It’s interesting to read when someone with a deep knowledge of traditional finance gives an in-depth take on crypto. Especially, since the crypto industry is IMHO destined to merge or at least bridge with TradFi in the not-so-long-term future. Otherwise, it will likely “embark on a journey to irrelevance” to use the lingo of ECB. Here’s a cartoon from the Bitcoin maximalist community:

Anyway, the Bloomberg columnist Levine published a long post this Monday titled “Crypto’s Credit bubble” about 3AC and FTX/Alameda. Levine would like to compare the crypto industry crisis of 2022 with the financial crisis of 2008 since both events are strongly connected by an intense demand for “safe assets”. Levine explains:

“Safe assets,” in this context, means places to invest your cryptocurrency or stablecoins that earn interest, that feel like bank accounts rather than speculative investments (..) You wanted to own normal understandable stuff (dollars, perhaps Bitcoins) and get paid a lot of interest for participating in “crypto”.

However, crypto is unable to manufacture “safe assets” in this sense, since “there are not a lot of people borrowing Bitcoin or stablecoins to buy houses or build factories or whatever.” Quoting Levine again:

The safe assets in crypto — interest-bearing accounts at Voyager or Celsius or BlockFi or Gemini — are created by making unsecured billion-dollar loans, negotiated in a single phone call, to arbitrage trading firms that are actually just making long-term bets on the marketing abilities of blockchain entrepreneurs. Crypto shadow banks did not manufacture safe assets out of risky investments; they just relabeled the risky investments as safe assets. There were people taking wild speculative risks on brand-new, sentiment-driven crypto projects, and there were people who wanted to invest safely and earn 8%, and they were the same people.

The essence as I see it is this: prices in the crypto market have so far mainly been driven by hype, marketing efforts, and value created out of thin air. This could change in time, but I remain skeptical.

Vitalik Buterin Looks Towards the Future

While Matt Levine looks back at 2022, Vitalik Buterin looks towards the future and writes about what excites him in Ethereum’s ecosystem. He makes one point in particular that I would like to dwell on.

To Buterin, “the first and most important application” of crypto is “money”. He recalls a time when he was able to pay with ETH in a random coffee shop in Argentina. This showed him the “sheer reach of adoption” although he admits that the transaction did not make a lot of practical sense:

The one issue with my coffee transaction is that it did not really make pragmatic sense. The fee was high, about a third of the value of the transaction. The transaction took several minutes to confirm: I believe that at the time, Status did not yet support sending proper EIP-1559 transactions that more reliably confirm quickly. If, like many other Argentinian crypto users, I had simply had a Binance wallet, the transfer would have been free and instant.

If the transaction was made from one Binance account to another, it would be exactly like a regular bank transaction but in crypto. “Free and instant”, perhaps yes, but honestly to me, and I believe to most other people, everyday Visa transactions seem pretty free and instant too.

One thing that I am genuinely curious about:

When Layer 2 solutions such as the Lightning Network are further developed, and Bitcoin can be used as a more practical means for everyday payments, what would that mean for other cryptocurrencies? Bitcoin being a much larger, more secure, and more censorship-resistant network. In this light, are other cryptocurrencies even relevant as money? I think not, but prove me wrong.

Rune Christensen’s End Game Plan

In connection with Maker’s End Game Plan — which the community has voted in favor of — founder and CEO of Maker, Rune Christensen, wrote a top-notch essay where he argues why DeFi will likely move towards a new paradigm with more regulation and centralization.

He described “the post-9/11 paradigm” that “when taken to its extreme, divides all financial activity into two boxes: Either you’re fully compliant, regulated bank, or you’re a terrorist.”

According to Christensen, DeFi and crypto had a window of opportunity to prove to the financial world and to regulators that a happy medium could exist between the two extremes. If DeFi and crypto could provide tangible benefits to people, for example by mass financing renewable energy projects or by helping people in developing countries to access financial services at scale, the industry could perhaps escape “the terrorist box”, avoid heavy regulation, and be treated by governments as a public good like Linux or roads.

However, that window of opportunity is now closed for good.

First of all, the blockchain industry completely and utterly failed to produce anything of value during the bull run. Basically nothing was achieved and no new products, services or anything with tangible benefit derived from blockchain technology has entered the mainstream consciousness at any level.

And then on top of that, disasters such as Terra, Celsius, and other crypto scams (recently FTX) are now “synonymous with blockchain and crypto in the public consciousness”.

On this background, it should not come as a surprise to anyone that crypto regulation is coming, and probably coming hard. For most crypto projects this means comply or goodbye.

My Own Opinion

In full disclosure, I have taken some brutal beatings for my crypto investments this year. So if I come across as kind of bitter, it’s because I am.

For one thing, my MetaMask wallet was recently hacked. I had a weird, eerie feeling as I saw how my crypto funds were transferred to a stranger’s address, but there is nothing to do. Customer service told me to contact the police but it should be extremely obvious that they don’t have the means to identify the culprit or retrieve the stolen crypto.

In sheer desperation, I reached out to a group on Reddit to see if someone had been in the same situation and could offer guidance. Within ten minutes I received something like twenty friendly requests from other Reddit users offering their help. Almost every single one of them, perhaps with one or two exceptions, was trying in sneaky ways to make me send a screenshot of my private keys. Like scavengers closing in on a wounded animal.

One of the major selling arguments for DeFi over banks is that DeFi is more transparent. However, because of the inherent complexity of using DeFi, this is not true for most users. Unless the user is experienced and able to skillfully audit smart contracts, which you by the way should be able to if you invest in the space.

Because of the inherent complexity and complete lack of regulation, DeFi is a breeding ground for cybercriminals. They can literally commit theft without consequences. Navigating the space is difficult, since scammers, hackers, and fake gurus are standing at every corner waiting to sell you a dream while they take your money. You don’t know who to trust, and the lack of trust is a major issue, although crypto in theory should be “trustless”.

The lack of legal regulation is of course not sustainable. And besides, for mainstream appeal, crypto should be more convenient to use. If broader adoption is the goal, Vitalik Buterin and other developers should probably put less energy into exchanging nerdgasms, and focus more on making crypto services user-friendly and beneficial.

I share Rune Christensen’s sentiment that crypto is likely moving towards more regulation and more centralization. I believe this is a desirable development. Bitcoin is (hopefully) going to remain the same at its core.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • U.S. Congressman Mike Flood: Looking forward to working with the next SEC Chairman to revoke the anti-crypto banking policy SAB 121

     US House of Representatives will investigate Representative Mike Flood's recent statement: "Despite widespread opposition, SAB 121 is still operating as a regulation, even though it has never gone through the normal Administrative Procedure Act process." Flood said, "I look forward to working with the next SEC chairman to revoke SAB 121. Whether Chairman Gary Gensler resigns on his own or President Trump fulfills his promise to dismiss Gensler, the new government has an excellent opportunity to usher in a new era after Gensler's departure." He added, "It's not surprising that Gensler opposed the digital asset regulatory framework passed by the House on a bipartisan basis earlier this year. 71 Democrats and House Republicans passed this common-sense framework together. Although the Democratic-led Senate rejected it, it represented a breakthrough moment for cryptocurrency and may provide information for the work of the unified Republican government when the next Congress begins in January next year."

  • Indian billionaire Adani summoned by US SEC to explain position on bribery case

    Indian billionaire Gautam Adani and his nephew, Sahil Adani, have been subpoenaed by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to explain allegations of paying over $250 million in bribes to win solar power contracts. According to the Press Trust of India (PTI), the subpoena has been delivered to the Adani family's residence in Ahmedabad, a city in western India, and they have been given 21 days to respond. The notice, issued on November 21 by the Eastern District Court of New York, states that if the Adani family fails to respond on time, a default judgment will be made against them.

  • U.S. Congressman: SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce may become the new acting chairman of the SEC

    US Congressman French Hill revealed at the North American Blockchain Summit (NABS) that Republican SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce is "likely" to become the new acting chair of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). He noted that current chair Gary Gensler will step down on January 20, 2025, and the Republican Party will take over the SEC, with Peirce expected to succeed him.

  • Tether spokesperson: The relationship with Cantor is purely business, and the claim that Lutnick influenced regulatory actions is pure nonsense

     a spokesperson for Tether stated: "The relationship between Tether and Cantor Fitzgerald is purely a business relationship based on managing reserves. Claims that Howard Lutnick's joining the transition team in some way implies an influence on regulatory actions are baseless."

  • Bitwise CEO warns that ETHW is not suitable for all investors and has high risks and high volatility

    Hunter Horsley, CEO of Bitwise, posted on X platform that he was happy to see capital inflows into Bitwise's Ethereum exchange-traded fund ETHW, iShares, and Fidelity this Friday. He reminded that ETHW is not a registered investment company under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940 and therefore is not protected by the law. ETHW is not suitable for all investors due to its high risk and volatility.

  • Musk said he liked the "WOULD" meme, and the related tokens rose 400 times in a short period of time

    Musk posted a picture on his social media platform saying he likes the "WOULD" meme. As a result, the meme coin with the same name briefly surged. According to GMGN data, the meme coin with the same name created 123 days ago surged over 400 times in a short period of time, with a current market value of 4.5 million US dollars. Reminder to users: Meme coins have no practical use cases, prices are highly volatile, and investment should be cautious.

  • Victory Securities: Funding Rates halved and fell, Bitcoin's short-term direction is not one-sided

    Zhou Lele, the Vice Chief Operating Officer of Victory Securities, analyzed that the macro and high-level negative impact risks in the cryptocurrency market have passed. The risks are now more focused on expected realization, such as the American entrepreneur Musk and the American "Efficiency Department" (DOGE) led by Ramaswamy. After media reports, the increase in Dogecoin ($DOGE) was only 5.7%, while Dogecoin rose by 83% in the week when the US election results were announced. Last week, the net inflow of off-exchange Bitcoin ETF was US$1.67 billion, and the holdings of exchange contracts and CME contracts remained high, but the funding rates halved and fell back, indicating that the direction of Bitcoin in the short term is not one-sided, and bears are also accumulating strength.

  • ECB board member Villeroy: Falling inflation allows ECB to cut interest rates

     ECB board member Villeroy de Galhau said in an interview that the decline in inflation allows the ECB to lower interest rates. In addition, the slow pace of price increases compared to average wages is also a factor in the rate cut. Villeroy de Galhau emphasized that the ECB's interest rate policy decision is independent of the Fed. Evidence shows that the ECB began to lower interest rates in early June, while the Fed lowered interest rates three months later. With the decline in inflation, we will be able to continue to lower interest rates. Currently, the market generally expects the ECB to cut interest rates by 25 basis points at the next meeting in December, but weaker data increases the possibility of a 50 basis point cut.

  • State Street warns Bitcoin craze could distract gold investors

    George Milling-Stanley, the head of gold strategy at Dominion Bank, warned that the rise of Bitcoin may mislead investors to overlook the stability of gold. He believes that Bitcoin is more like a return-driven investment, while gold provides long-term stability. He also criticized Bitcoin promoters for misleading the market by using the term "mining," and believes that gold is still a more reliable investment choice.