The article argues against overloading Ethereum's consensus with external applications and protocols, as it poses high systemic risks to the ecosystem.
While reusing validators for other purposes is low-risk, attempting to recruit Ethereum social consensus for an application's own purposes is high-risk and should be discouraged.
The article provides examples of low-risk and high-risk situations, highlighting the potential consequences of stretching Ethereum consensus beyond its intended purpose.
The author suggests case-by-case solutions to address these problems, such as not-quite-cryptoeconomic decentralized oracles or validator-voting-based oracles that do not rely on L1 consensus for recovery.
All Comments