The Shanghai Songjiang Court recently heard a dispute over an information network purchase and sale contract. It is reported that the plaintiff spent more than 100,000 yuan to purchase a batch of "mining" equipment, but found that some parts were actually second-hand goods, so he sued for a refund and compensation of three times the amount. After trial, the Songjiang Court believed that the premise of applying the Consumer Rights Protection Law is to purchase and use goods for daily consumption needs. In this case, Mr. Li did not purchase and use the goods for daily consumption needs, and whether he has already made a profit is not the basis for judging whether he is an ordinary consumer. Therefore, the dispute in this case does not apply to the Consumer Rights Protection Law, and the claim for "refund and compensation of three times the amount" is unfounded, and the court does not support it.