BlackRock argues that the US Securities and Exchange Commission has no legitimate reason to treat applications for physically-backed cryptocurrency exchange-traded funds (ETFs) differently from those for futures-based cryptocurrency ETFs. After submitting a 19b-4 application to the SEC on behalf of the company on Nasdaq, BlackRock's physically-backed Ethereum (ETH) ETF called "iShares Ethereum Trust" was officially approved on November 9th. In its application, BlackRock questions the SEC's treatment of physically-backed cryptocurrency ETFs, claiming that the agency's reasons for repeatedly rejecting these applications are incorrect regarding regulatory differences between futures-based and physically-backed ETFs.
Welcome Back
Click “Sign in” to agree to Cointime’s Terms of Service and acknowledge that Cointime’s Privacy Policy applies to you.
Join CoinTime
Already have an account?
Click “page.Sign up” to agree to Cointime’s <a class="underline" href="#term-of-service">Terms of Service</a> and acknowledge that Cointime’s a class="underline" href="#privacy-policy">Privacy Policy</a> applies to you.
Sign in with email
Sign up with email
Your email
Check your inbox
Click the link we sent to to sign in.
Click the link we sent to to sign up.
BlackRock: SEC has no reason to treat cryptocurrency futures and spot ETFs differently
-
Wechat scan to share
Recommended for you
-
U.S. Congressman Mike Flood: Looking forward to working with the next SEC Chairman to revoke the anti-crypto banking policy SAB 121
US House of Representatives will investigate Representative Mike Flood's recent statement: "Despite widespread opposition, SAB 121 is still operating as a regulation, even though it has never gone through the normal Administrative Procedure Act process." Flood said, "I look forward to working with the next SEC chairman to revoke SAB 121. Whether Chairman Gary Gensler resigns on his own or President Trump fulfills his promise to dismiss Gensler, the new government has an excellent opportunity to usher in a new era after Gensler's departure." He added, "It's not surprising that Gensler opposed the digital asset regulatory framework passed by the House on a bipartisan basis earlier this year. 71 Democrats and House Republicans passed this common-sense framework together. Although the Democratic-led Senate rejected it, it represented a breakthrough moment for cryptocurrency and may provide information for the work of the unified Republican government when the next Congress begins in January next year." -
Indian billionaire Adani summoned by US SEC to explain position on bribery case
Indian billionaire Gautam Adani and his nephew, Sahil Adani, have been subpoenaed by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to explain allegations of paying over $250 million in bribes to win solar power contracts. According to the Press Trust of India (PTI), the subpoena has been delivered to the Adani family's residence in Ahmedabad, a city in western India, and they have been given 21 days to respond. The notice, issued on November 21 by the Eastern District Court of New York, states that if the Adani family fails to respond on time, a default judgment will be made against them. -
U.S. Congressman: SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce may become the new acting chairman of the SEC
US Congressman French Hill revealed at the North American Blockchain Summit (NABS) that Republican SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce is "likely" to become the new acting chair of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). He noted that current chair Gary Gensler will step down on January 20, 2025, and the Republican Party will take over the SEC, with Peirce expected to succeed him. -
Tether spokesperson: The relationship with Cantor is purely business, and the claim that Lutnick influenced regulatory actions is pure nonsense
a spokesperson for Tether stated: "The relationship between Tether and Cantor Fitzgerald is purely a business relationship based on managing reserves. Claims that Howard Lutnick's joining the transition team in some way implies an influence on regulatory actions are baseless." -
Bitwise CEO warns that ETHW is not suitable for all investors and has high risks and high volatility
Hunter Horsley, CEO of Bitwise, posted on X platform that he was happy to see capital inflows into Bitwise's Ethereum exchange-traded fund ETHW, iShares, and Fidelity this Friday. He reminded that ETHW is not a registered investment company under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940 and therefore is not protected by the law. ETHW is not suitable for all investors due to its high risk and volatility. -
Trump pledges to fire SEC Chair Gary Gensler ‘on day one’ if reelected
The Republican candidate laid out a plan for crypto policies should he win in November against prospective Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris.
-
Cointime July 27th News Express
1. As of July 25, BlackRock IBIT held more than 338,000 bitcoins, an increase of more than 1,092 bitcoins from the previous day. -
As of July 25, BlackRock IBIT held more than 338,000 bitcoins, an increase of more than 1,092 bitcoins from the previous day.
BlackRock's official update on the Bitcoin ETF shows that as of July 25th, the market value of IBIT has reached $21,890,121,436.41, and the position has increased to 338,128.5551 BTC, an increase of 1,092.7881 BTC from the previous trading day. -
BlackRock IBIT saw a total net inflow of $705 million this week
TraderT monitored that Belad IBIT had a net inflow of 1,730 BTC yesterday, with a trading volume of 1.8 billion US dollars. In the 28th week since its listing, IBIT has accumulated a net inflow of 705 million US dollars.
Daily Must-Read
-
Uniswap Labs, UNI holders could make $468M a year from new L2: DeFi Report
-
Avalanche Foundation to buy back nearly 2M AVAX sold to Terra in 2022
-
Gold Fever Hits Costco: 77% of Stores Sell Out Amid Soaring Demand for Bullion
-
$500M Bitcoin Buried in Landfill: Man Sues City After Decade-Long Battle for Recovery
-
Former BAYC creative director Jeff Nicholas joins Meta’s Reality Labs
-
Why is Solana's Dogwifhat (WIF) memecoin crashing?
All Comments