Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Tokenology: Moving Beyond ‘Tokenomics’

“Tokens” are a hot-button topic for those in crypto and web3. Even beyond web3, tokens are capturing mindshare from anyone interested in art, cryptography, design, economics, gaming, math, psychology, and more.

Tokens have been described as everything from a “breakthrough in open network design” to a “new digital primitive” (analogous to the website). We can generally define tokens “as an internet-native unit of value”. But here’s the key point: tokens represent not just monetary value, but also social, reputational, and so on. There are many forms of value.

Tokens represent multidimensional value; they are a vector, not a scalar. Borrowing from mathematical notation, scalars have only magnitude — vectors have both magnitude and direction. A specific token can represent ownership, membership, identity, and more. Crucially, tokens matter because they allow builders to keep the high-dimensionality inherent in any representation of value, and thus open up a rich new design space.

This is also why I believe the term “tokenomics” — for describing the study and design of tokens — is very limited and inherently constraining. It fails to capture and convey the full dimensionality of that rich design space. Tokens can be used to coordinate and organize people not only within, but beyond, a purely economic context.

Token design is still in a nascent phase, so reducing the dimensionality of tokens to a purely economic context limits what’s possible to build here. That’s why I think we need another term. I propose “Tokenology”, designating “the study” — of how to coordinate people, organizations, and/or computation towards a common goal — primarily through the use of cryptography and mechanism design.

But first, a bit more about what tokens are, and why they matter

To put tokens in the broader context of blockchains & crypto: Blockchains are a new computational paradigm that have created a novel way to organize people, societies, and capital. Two key benefits of blockchains are composability and tokens. Here, I’m focusing on tokens.

The terms people use in the crypto industry also include “token model”, “token mechanism”, or “token design” (we use that last one, too; see here). But they all refer to how a token interacts with an associated protocol, system, or mechanism. For example: Ethereum’s token model specifies how ether works in the protocol; the token model is a subset of the protocol as a whole.

So, more concretely, how can we use tokens? There are many ways, but to summarize a few current use cases, we can use tokens:

For ownership. Blockchains are the first way to launch user-owned-and-operated open source services at scale; Ethereum is an excellent example of a user-owned-and-operated “world computer”. Tokens also give users digital “property rights”, which is another important concept here. Finally, tokens allow for the ownership of hyperstructures, defined as “crypto protocols that can run for free and forever, without maintenance, interruption or intermediaries.” In this context, they would also create value that is accessible and destructible by the owners; but that value need not be monetary only and can be extremely valuable in other ways.

For alignment. Creator coins, social tokens, and NFTs allow fans to directly interact with the artists they love the most, and to prove their fandom — whether as an early adopter, to show intensity of support, or for community and meaning. Dogecoin’s strength, for instance, is the meme, community, and “religion” it represents. Tokens can also be extended to not only represent membership in this community, but to establish a digital cultural identity; in this context, holders of such tokens can also vote on creative decisions in decentralized collaboration between creator and community.

For incentive structures. Incentive design has often been described as the key to understanding and motivating human behavior, but it can also align systems, organizations, and networks. Tokens help coordinate validators and miners in Ethereum and Bitcoin, respectively. They also enable decentralized governance in DeFi protocols like Uniswap, Compound, and others. Tokens can assist in membership growth and derivative creation for NFT projects like BAYC or digitally native DAOs and communities like FWB.

For accessing goods and services. Smart contract platforms like Ethereum sell the service of computation; Helium allows anyone to purchase LoRaWAN and 5G transit; and Filecoin allows anyone to pay for data storage… to name just a few examples. Many NFTs are also used to “gate” digital and physical experiences. Token gating can be used to prioritize early, or more active community members, or via other criteria as a way to distinguish between casual and more dedicated participants and to ensure a richer experience overall.

This list of use cases for tokens is nowhere near a comprehensive list, of course; it’s still just the beginning. But as you can see, this is an extremely rich design space — and slices across the arts, economics, and much, much more.

The case for a new term

Tokens clearly matter — and not just to the crypto industry, but beyond. Once they are combined with the other key feature and benefit of blockchains — that of composability — then one can really understand more deeply how the direction, and not just the magnitude, tokens can represent so much more.

Tokens, again, represent value as a vector, not a scalar. It is only when we recognize tokens as the native way of representing value vectors that one can begin to convey the rich design space here.

“Value” is an abstraction and most folks conflate “value” and “money”. Tokens let you make value explicit without being money. I’d argue that because the modern western economy denominates value almost entirely in U.S. dollars, it loses information by reducing a high-dimensionality vector into a scalar. For the most part today value is either 1) implicit, or 2) only explicit in the form of U.S. dollars. Value can be represented in several other ways, including around the U.S. dollar. All interactions actually transfer value, most easily seen in the form of time and information.

The key is developers should be able to make implicit value explicit using a new token design.

So whether we call it “Tokenology” as I suggest here, simply drawing on the study of tokens; or something else — I’m curious for what you’d propose as an alternative as well! — we need to move beyond just tokenomics = tokens + economics. It’s tokenology = tokens x economics x art x …. A new term may also help us usher in a new and richer era of token design as well.

editors: Sonal Chokshi, Steph Zinn

The views expressed here are those of the individual AH Capital Management, L.L.C. (“a16z”) personnel quoted and are not the views of a16z or its affiliates. Certain information contained in here has been obtained from third-party sources, including from portfolio companies of funds managed by a16z. While taken from sources believed to be reliable, a16z has not independently verified such information and makes no representations about the current or enduring accuracy of the information or its appropriateness for a given situation. In addition, this content may include third-party advertisements; a16z has not reviewed such advertisements and does not endorse any advertising content contained therein.

This content is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon as legal, business, investment, or tax advice. You should consult your own advisers as to those matters. References to any securities or digital assets are for illustrative purposes only, and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Furthermore, this content is not directed at nor intended for use by any investors or prospective investors, and may not under any circumstances be relied upon when making a decision to invest in any fund managed by a16z. (An offering to invest in an a16z fund will be made only by the private placement memorandum, subscription agreement, and other relevant documentation of any such fund and should be read in their entirety.) Any investments or portfolio companies mentioned, referred to, or described are not representative of all investments in vehicles managed by a16z, and there can be no assurance that the investments will be profitable or that other investments made in the future will have similar characteristics or results. A list of investments made by funds managed by Andreessen Horowitz (excluding investments for which the issuer has not provided permission for a16z to disclose publicly as well as unannounced investments in publicly traded digital assets) is available at https://a16z.com/investments/.

Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others. Please see https://a16z.com/disclosures for additional important information.

Read more: https://a16zcrypto.com/content/article/beyond-tokenomics-tokenology/

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • David Sacks: The U.S. government’s premature sale of Bitcoin has cost U.S. taxpayers more than $17 billion

    White House AI and cryptocurrency chief David Sacks posted on social media, "The early sale of Bitcoin by the US government has cost American taxpayers over $17 billion. Now, the federal government will develop a strategy to maximize the value of its Bitcoin holdings."

  • David Sacks: The U.S. government will not acquire other crypto assets for strategic reserves except for confiscated assets

    White House AI and cryptocurrency chief David Sacks posted on social media that President Trump's executive order also established the U.S. Digital Asset Reserve, which includes digital assets other than Bitcoin confiscated in criminal or civil litigation. In addition to assets obtained through confiscation procedures, the government will not acquire other assets for the reserve assets. The purpose of the reserve is to manage government digital assets under the leadership of the Treasury Department.

  • Forbes reporter: Trump's executive order will establish two types of digital asset storage mechanisms

    Forbes reporter Eleanor Terrett wrote on X platform that Trump's executive order will establish two different digital asset storage mechanisms: Bitcoin Strategic Reserve and Digital Asset Reserve. The Bitcoin Strategic Reserve will contain approximately 200,000 BTC obtained through criminal and civil forfeitures, with the government authorized to explore ways to acquire more bitcoin without increasing the taxpayer burden. The Digital Asset Reserve will include other digital assets such as XRP, ADA, ETH, and SOL, but the government will not actively seek to purchase these assets. The executive order also requires a comprehensive audit of all digital assets held by the government. According to David Sacks, the purpose of the reserves is "responsible management of government digital assets by the U.S. Treasury Department."

  • In the past hour, the entire network has liquidated 152 million US dollars, mainly long orders

    Data shows that in the past 1 hour, the entire network has liquidated $152 million, with long positions liquidated $119 million and short positions liquidated $33.3292 million, with the main liquidation being long positions. Among them, ETH liquidated $12.5215 million and BTC liquidated $88.1221 million.

  • August Completes $10 Million Financing, Led by Dragonfly Ventures

    On March 7th, it was reported that the cryptocurrency broker August completed a $10 million financing round, led by Dragonfly Ventures, with participation from Foresight Ventures, Standard Chartered Bank, and 6th Man Ventures. The funds raised will be used to develop marketing strategies, hire more employees, and continue to develop new technologies. August is a brokerage company focused on cryptocurrencies, aiming to connect customers with lending cryptocurrencies and providing derivatives and token trading on the DeFi network, including Aave, Morpho, and Uniswap.

  • Hong Kong SAR Legislative Council Member Wu Jiezhuang: Hong Kong does not have an official currency

    Hong Kong Legislative Councilor Wu Jiezhuang said that Hong Kong does not have an official currency. Some citizens and Web3 practitioners have asked me about someone impersonating the Chief Executive to post on the X platform that they will launch the Hong Kong Coin on the Solana chain (launch of the National Hong Kong Coin). The government has sternly clarified that the information is absolutely false and intentionally deceptive. Please remember to be careful and not to mislead and fall victim to fraud.

  • Trump family’s WLFI project purchased $25 million in WBTC, ETH and MOVE tokens

    According to Arkham monitoring data, the wallet of the Trump family's project World Liberty Fi (WLFI) has just transferred 25 million USDC to an independent contract. The contract then purchased $10 million worth of ETH, $10 million worth of WBTC, and $1.5 million worth of MOVE tokens. After the purchase was completed, these assets were transferred back to WLFI's main wallet. This move is seen as a signal that the Trump project is further entering the cryptocurrency market, although its specific strategic intent is not yet clear.

  • Circle mints another 250 million USDC on Solana

    According to OnchainLens monitoring, Circle has minted an additional 250 million USDC on Solana. As of now, they have minted a total of 9.25 billion USDC on Solana by 2025.

  • US spot Bitcoin ETFs saw a net inflow of $21.7 million yesterday

    According to TraderT monitoring, the net inflow of the US spot Bitcoin ETF was 21.7 million US dollars yesterday.

  • US media: TSMC invests another $100 billion in the US; Trump still considers imposing tariffs on Taiwanese chips

    Golden Finance reported that TSMC is investing another billion US dollars in the United States, but the US "Wired" magazine reported on the 4th that an informed source said that this move did not stop the Trump administration from considering imposing potential tariffs of up to 100% on TSMC and other Taiwanese chip factories. The source said that one plan is that the tax objects will not only be Taiwanese chips themselves, but also electronic products such as iPhones equipped with Taiwanese chips. According to Wired magazine, the White House and the US Department of Commerce did not immediately comment, and TSMC declined to comment. (Jinshi)