Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

The Next Crypto Bull Run Won’t Look Like the Last One

Validated Individual Expert

Jacob Felder fiddled with the key fob of his brand new Lamborghini, somewhat still in disbelief at his fortune, and remembering that no so long ago he was foaming lattes, working as a barrista at his local coffeeshop.

But what a difference a couple of months in the crypto markets can make.

In the fall of 2017, Felder, and others like him, would become freshly-minted millionaires, punch drunk from the heady and highly speculative, leverage-fueled returns of the initial coin offering or ICO craze.

By the summer of 2018, Felder would be driving an old Toyota and looking for a job.

Like it or not, speculation, and the leverage that has helped fuel that speculation, is an integral part of the cryptocurrency industry.

Buy This Shiny New Thing

When a brand-new, barely understood technology, meets with the marketing machinery borne out of speculation, it’s small wonder that the ensuing bubble can develop with such haste and reckless abandon.

But if the 2018 crypto crash and the 2022 one taught investors and traders anything, it’s that the crypto industry has reached sufficient terminal velocity that at the very least supports cycles.

Depending on the frame of reference, on average, the crypto markets experience a sharp correction once every four years on average, akin to the Olympics or the World Cup.

And every correction, the mistakes get magnified, thanks to the growing number of adopters and users of cryptocurrencies and the blockchain technology that underpins them.

For better or worse, while the quantitative value of the mistakes made in the nascent crypto industry are growing, qualitatively they have been the same.

Decentralize Dis

Despite being touted as a trustless system, there has been no shortage of grifters eager to sell their perverted brand of blockchain that hinges on “trust no one, but ok, trust me” centralizing an otherwise decentralized technology and paving the way for the frauds and failures that have pockmarked the evolution of the cryptocurrency industry.

From Mt. Gox in 2014 to FTX in 2022, loose lending and few (if any) risk controls and regulations have allowed the cryptocurrency industry to perpetuate larger failures and more egregious frauds.

Before the failure of Three Arrows Capital, lenders barely bothered to verify a crypto borrower’s ability to pay, preferring to rely on the assumption that the value of their security (crypto itself), would continue to appreciate in value.

In all likelihood, future crypto lenders will demand reams of evidence that borrowers can not only afford their loans, but that they will have ways to pay back on the interest.

Lenders and exchanges that once held big pools of “shitcoins” and undercollateralized loans with little consequence will no longer exist, and institutions that are looking to lend will surely insist on the same levels of security and surety as exists in the financial services industry.

Because regulation will be some time coming, the exotic instruments with ridiculous amounts of leverage like perpetual securities that have variable funding rates and other exotic instruments peculiar to the crypto markets alone, will likely persist for some time, but not indefinitely, and possibly only on the fringes.

Predictions that Bitcoin, the most visible bellwether of the cryptocurrency markets, will crash to below US$10,000, have thus far, failed to pan out, and by some measures, most of the worst excesses of leverage have been washed out by the numerous high-profile failures.

A recent measure of open interest in perpetual futures on Binance.com saw a drop of as much as 50.3%, suggesting that even if speculators are betting on crypto, they’d prefer to do it without borrowing.

To be sure, leverage washing out of an over-hyped and speculative market, against a backdrop of declining asset prices across the board, is unsurprising, and even healthy.

And whether or not Bitcoin can maintain its current level of between US$16,500 and US$17,500 (at the time of writing) remains to be seen, especially given that the crypto markets have never before run into a recession, which the U.S. Federal Reserve appears to be hellbent on ushering in through its continued rate hikes.

Higher Lows

Bitcoin has fallen around 64% for 2022, reasonably close to the losses it suffered in the last crash in 2018, where the cryptocurrency shed 70% of its dollar value in the wake of the ICO collapse.

What’s perhaps more interesting is that at current prices Bitcoin has only fallen 17% from its previous all-time-high in 2017 of around US$20,000 to US$16,500, whereas in 2018, Bitcoin fell to around US$3,500 — a higher low.

While there are plenty of speculators who bought cryptocurrencies on leverage, there appear to be just as many who are prepared to buy and hold the asset class with no borrowing.

What happens next will be critical.

With the U.S. Justice Department, Commodities and Futures Trading Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission all gunning after FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried, following the spectacular collapse of his cryptocurrency exchange under a hail of fraud allegations, the pressure to do something to regulate the crypto industry that has been infamously dubbed the “Wild West” will grow.

A redesign and overhaul of crypto’s lending apparatus and measures to better insulate the system from fraud and misrepresentation will help to make sure that the mistakes of 2018 and 2022 are not repeated.

Similar to the way reforms of the financial system took place in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, reform will need to be taken in the cryptocurrency industry as well, if it is to persist.

And just as the 2008 financial crisis ushered in a new era of borrowing prudence, the 2022 crypto crash could possibly do the same and fresh crypto regulations could help prevent a return to the old ways of doing business.

Regulators could reign in the worst excesses of crypto lenders to make sure that borrowers don’t take loans they can’t afford and leverage brought back down to realistic levels.

Many of the centralized crypto operators and exchanges that didn’t require evidence of repayment ability or even basic AML and KYC will need to adapt to fresh restrictions when they are rolled out.

The good news is that those who bought crypto at or near the peak, especially on leverage, are likely to already have sold their holdings, but any recovery is likely to be uneven.

What next?

Investors who were burned by the frauds and fiascoes of 2022 are unlikely to return to the crypto markets in a hurry, especially if they had lost a substantial amount in this “Crypto Winter” but there will be fresh “crypto curious” who are wondering if just a taste of the nascent asset class wouldn’t help their portfolios in the long run.

As the crypto industry withdraws, licks its wounds and goes through a period of introspection, it’s likely that the tokens which make up the bulk of market cap in the next four years is unlikely to look as how it looks today.

Many of the shoddy practices by large crypto companies will (hopefully) be done away with as investors and lenders demand more mature industry practices to protect the value of their investments.

Regulations will undoubtedly take some time to formulate and follow-up with and while the fallout from FTX’s collapse was formidable enough to foment pressure for regulation, it will lack the sense of urgency that was present in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.

During this inter-bull period, when cryptocurrency markets are likely to see a lull in activity, is where the biggest bargains could be had.

Regardless of one’s view on the underlying technology, cryptocurrencies are likely here to stay and their true value, only just being understood.

The same way that the internet was dismissed in the aftermath of the dotcom bubble, it would be shortsighted to write off crypto because of the crash of 2022.

But investors hoping that token prices will soar by high multiples will need to manage their expectations.

From the depths of the 2001 dotcom crash, it took the stocks of technology companies almost two decades to plumb their all-time-highs, building tremendous value along the way to justify their heady valuations.

Interest rates may have hammered the stock prices of tech firms, but few would dare argue that the technologies and services they deliver are no longer relevant.

Just as price does not always equate value, the clutch of cryptocurrency firms that survive this downturn will need to deliver real value to customers and investors and the bull run in token prices and company valuations that exists in the horizon will need to be built on sustainable metrices of user growth, application use, and new service offerings.

Betting is instantaneous, but building takes time and for those who are not crypto-tourists, now is the time to build.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • David Sacks: The U.S. government’s premature sale of Bitcoin has cost U.S. taxpayers more than $17 billion

    White House AI and cryptocurrency chief David Sacks posted on social media, "The early sale of Bitcoin by the US government has cost American taxpayers over $17 billion. Now, the federal government will develop a strategy to maximize the value of its Bitcoin holdings."

  • David Sacks: The U.S. government will not acquire other crypto assets for strategic reserves except for confiscated assets

    White House AI and cryptocurrency chief David Sacks posted on social media that President Trump's executive order also established the U.S. Digital Asset Reserve, which includes digital assets other than Bitcoin confiscated in criminal or civil litigation. In addition to assets obtained through confiscation procedures, the government will not acquire other assets for the reserve assets. The purpose of the reserve is to manage government digital assets under the leadership of the Treasury Department.

  • Forbes reporter: Trump's executive order will establish two types of digital asset storage mechanisms

    Forbes reporter Eleanor Terrett wrote on X platform that Trump's executive order will establish two different digital asset storage mechanisms: Bitcoin Strategic Reserve and Digital Asset Reserve. The Bitcoin Strategic Reserve will contain approximately 200,000 BTC obtained through criminal and civil forfeitures, with the government authorized to explore ways to acquire more bitcoin without increasing the taxpayer burden. The Digital Asset Reserve will include other digital assets such as XRP, ADA, ETH, and SOL, but the government will not actively seek to purchase these assets. The executive order also requires a comprehensive audit of all digital assets held by the government. According to David Sacks, the purpose of the reserves is "responsible management of government digital assets by the U.S. Treasury Department."

  • In the past hour, the entire network has liquidated 152 million US dollars, mainly long orders

    Data shows that in the past 1 hour, the entire network has liquidated $152 million, with long positions liquidated $119 million and short positions liquidated $33.3292 million, with the main liquidation being long positions. Among them, ETH liquidated $12.5215 million and BTC liquidated $88.1221 million.

  • August Completes $10 Million Financing, Led by Dragonfly Ventures

    On March 7th, it was reported that the cryptocurrency broker August completed a $10 million financing round, led by Dragonfly Ventures, with participation from Foresight Ventures, Standard Chartered Bank, and 6th Man Ventures. The funds raised will be used to develop marketing strategies, hire more employees, and continue to develop new technologies. August is a brokerage company focused on cryptocurrencies, aiming to connect customers with lending cryptocurrencies and providing derivatives and token trading on the DeFi network, including Aave, Morpho, and Uniswap.

  • Hong Kong SAR Legislative Council Member Wu Jiezhuang: Hong Kong does not have an official currency

    Hong Kong Legislative Councilor Wu Jiezhuang said that Hong Kong does not have an official currency. Some citizens and Web3 practitioners have asked me about someone impersonating the Chief Executive to post on the X platform that they will launch the Hong Kong Coin on the Solana chain (launch of the National Hong Kong Coin). The government has sternly clarified that the information is absolutely false and intentionally deceptive. Please remember to be careful and not to mislead and fall victim to fraud.

  • Trump family’s WLFI project purchased $25 million in WBTC, ETH and MOVE tokens

    According to Arkham monitoring data, the wallet of the Trump family's project World Liberty Fi (WLFI) has just transferred 25 million USDC to an independent contract. The contract then purchased $10 million worth of ETH, $10 million worth of WBTC, and $1.5 million worth of MOVE tokens. After the purchase was completed, these assets were transferred back to WLFI's main wallet. This move is seen as a signal that the Trump project is further entering the cryptocurrency market, although its specific strategic intent is not yet clear.

  • Circle mints another 250 million USDC on Solana

    According to OnchainLens monitoring, Circle has minted an additional 250 million USDC on Solana. As of now, they have minted a total of 9.25 billion USDC on Solana by 2025.

  • US spot Bitcoin ETFs saw a net inflow of $21.7 million yesterday

    According to TraderT monitoring, the net inflow of the US spot Bitcoin ETF was 21.7 million US dollars yesterday.

  • US media: TSMC invests another $100 billion in the US; Trump still considers imposing tariffs on Taiwanese chips

    Golden Finance reported that TSMC is investing another billion US dollars in the United States, but the US "Wired" magazine reported on the 4th that an informed source said that this move did not stop the Trump administration from considering imposing potential tariffs of up to 100% on TSMC and other Taiwanese chip factories. The source said that one plan is that the tax objects will not only be Taiwanese chips themselves, but also electronic products such as iPhones equipped with Taiwanese chips. According to Wired magazine, the White House and the US Department of Commerce did not immediately comment, and TSMC declined to comment. (Jinshi)