Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

The Top 10 Red Flags You MUST Watch Out Before Investing in a Crypto Project

You want to invest your money into crypto? Good, you should know you’re at the mercy of whales and sharks. That’s why you gotta be smart. Look out for these red flags before putting your money to work:

1.- Lack of transparency or clear information about the team behind the project, their backgrounds, and their experience in the cryptocurrency industry.

To be honest, most projects should be anonymous by the nature of cryptocurrency. In fact bitcoin is anonymous in itself. However that must be justified with some kind of proof and system to verify the legitimacy of the people behind the project.

2.- Unclear or unrealistic goals or roadmap for the project.

Unclear or unrealistic goals or roadmap for a cryptocurrency project can be a red flag for several reasons. Firstly, it can indicate that the team behind the project may not have a solid understanding of the technology or the market, and may be unable to deliver on their promises.

This can make the project less attractive to potential investors, as they may be unsure of what to expect from the project and whether it is a good investment.

Additionally, unclear or unrealistic goals can also indicate that the team may not be committed to the long-term success of the project, and may be more interested in making a quick profit. This can create uncertainty and doubt among investors, and can lead to a lack of confidence in the project.

Furthermore, a lack of a clear roadmap can make it difficult for investors to track the progress of the project, and can make it harder for the team to hold themselves accountable for meeting their goals. This can lead to a lack of trust between the team and the investors, and can ultimately damage the reputation and success of the project.

3.- Lack of a solid use case or real-world application for the cryptocurrency.

Think about it. If a project can’t be used in the real world what’s the point of it? It’s like building a spoon to eat meat. Useless.

Therefore you gotta pay attention to what projects are building. See if they know their target. Their needs. Their wants. If they are solving a burning problem for some people, then they are building a great project.

4.- Overly positive or unrealistic claims about the potential returns or benefits of investing in the project.

Some projects are filled with shillers that want to keep up the positivity and feel-good momentum. That’s not bad in itself. However it turns into a problem when those people ignore the problems naturally occurring within a project.

Eventually those people lose their enthusiasm. Which causes them to turn against the project and lose all the good morale.

5.- Lack of a viable business model or source of revenue to support the project.

Every single crypto project is a business. That’s right. It may not look like it but their goal is to make money in a recurring manner.

When a project makes a lot of money every month, all the token holders and participants they benefit. When that doesn’t happen, problems arise.

6.- Large amounts of pre-mining or pre-allocation of the cryptocurrency to the development team or early investors.

Oh boy this one is big. Some projects reserve huge amounts of the total supply to the team. They end up having too much control and end up ruling over all the investors.

That’s never a good sign because they can shut down the project anytime and cause issues whenever they do it.

7.- A high number of complaints or negative reviews from other users or investors.

Now this one is tricky. Every project has haters and people trying to take it down. But when it’s in a consistent basis and you see nothing but negativity, it’s because there has been some major issues and the project has to urgently work towards fixing them.

8.- High levels of hype or buzz around the project, without any substantive evidence to back up the claims being made.

I’ve seen it a million times. Projects that are super exciting. Projects that have all the right numbers and make you feel like you’re missing out.

They have been heavily manipulated to make you feel that way and invest with them. Be careful.

9.- Requiring investors to keep their funds locked up for an extended period of time, or imposing other restrictions on their ability to withdraw or sell their investments.

This one is very uncommon because people hate having their funds locked. That’s why it shouldn’t be that much of a concern.

However some projects are notoriously problematic with it. I myself invested in one token that required you to wait 9 months (!) to unstake the tokens with the rewards.

All while the token price was dropping everyday because the founders were selling their share slowly. Extremely frustrating. And all that wasn’t mentioned when I got the tokens.

10.- Insufficient security measures, such as a lack of two-factor authentication or other basic protections for user accounts and funds or audits.

Audits are essential. You can have the best code in the world but if nobody has gone into it and tried to break it down, that code is a hazard.

You can only know how good a project is by how secure it is. That’s why those projects that invest in good audits are winning.

Anyway that’s been it when it comes to red flags. You must remember that every project has red flags but it’s all about how the team takes care of them and how they respond that make the difference. Have a blessed week.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • U.S. Congressman Mike Flood: Looking forward to working with the next SEC Chairman to revoke the anti-crypto banking policy SAB 121

     US House of Representatives will investigate Representative Mike Flood's recent statement: "Despite widespread opposition, SAB 121 is still operating as a regulation, even though it has never gone through the normal Administrative Procedure Act process." Flood said, "I look forward to working with the next SEC chairman to revoke SAB 121. Whether Chairman Gary Gensler resigns on his own or President Trump fulfills his promise to dismiss Gensler, the new government has an excellent opportunity to usher in a new era after Gensler's departure." He added, "It's not surprising that Gensler opposed the digital asset regulatory framework passed by the House on a bipartisan basis earlier this year. 71 Democrats and House Republicans passed this common-sense framework together. Although the Democratic-led Senate rejected it, it represented a breakthrough moment for cryptocurrency and may provide information for the work of the unified Republican government when the next Congress begins in January next year."

  • Indian billionaire Adani summoned by US SEC to explain position on bribery case

    Indian billionaire Gautam Adani and his nephew, Sahil Adani, have been subpoenaed by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to explain allegations of paying over $250 million in bribes to win solar power contracts. According to the Press Trust of India (PTI), the subpoena has been delivered to the Adani family's residence in Ahmedabad, a city in western India, and they have been given 21 days to respond. The notice, issued on November 21 by the Eastern District Court of New York, states that if the Adani family fails to respond on time, a default judgment will be made against them.

  • U.S. Congressman: SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce may become the new acting chairman of the SEC

    US Congressman French Hill revealed at the North American Blockchain Summit (NABS) that Republican SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce is "likely" to become the new acting chair of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). He noted that current chair Gary Gensler will step down on January 20, 2025, and the Republican Party will take over the SEC, with Peirce expected to succeed him.

  • Tether spokesperson: The relationship with Cantor is purely business, and the claim that Lutnick influenced regulatory actions is pure nonsense

     a spokesperson for Tether stated: "The relationship between Tether and Cantor Fitzgerald is purely a business relationship based on managing reserves. Claims that Howard Lutnick's joining the transition team in some way implies an influence on regulatory actions are baseless."

  • Bitwise CEO warns that ETHW is not suitable for all investors and has high risks and high volatility

    Hunter Horsley, CEO of Bitwise, posted on X platform that he was happy to see capital inflows into Bitwise's Ethereum exchange-traded fund ETHW, iShares, and Fidelity this Friday. He reminded that ETHW is not a registered investment company under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940 and therefore is not protected by the law. ETHW is not suitable for all investors due to its high risk and volatility.

  • Musk said he liked the "WOULD" meme, and the related tokens rose 400 times in a short period of time

    Musk posted a picture on his social media platform saying he likes the "WOULD" meme. As a result, the meme coin with the same name briefly surged. According to GMGN data, the meme coin with the same name created 123 days ago surged over 400 times in a short period of time, with a current market value of 4.5 million US dollars. Reminder to users: Meme coins have no practical use cases, prices are highly volatile, and investment should be cautious.

  • Victory Securities: Funding Rates halved and fell, Bitcoin's short-term direction is not one-sided

    Zhou Lele, the Vice Chief Operating Officer of Victory Securities, analyzed that the macro and high-level negative impact risks in the cryptocurrency market have passed. The risks are now more focused on expected realization, such as the American entrepreneur Musk and the American "Efficiency Department" (DOGE) led by Ramaswamy. After media reports, the increase in Dogecoin ($DOGE) was only 5.7%, while Dogecoin rose by 83% in the week when the US election results were announced. Last week, the net inflow of off-exchange Bitcoin ETF was US$1.67 billion, and the holdings of exchange contracts and CME contracts remained high, but the funding rates halved and fell back, indicating that the direction of Bitcoin in the short term is not one-sided, and bears are also accumulating strength.

  • ECB board member Villeroy: Falling inflation allows ECB to cut interest rates

     ECB board member Villeroy de Galhau said in an interview that the decline in inflation allows the ECB to lower interest rates. In addition, the slow pace of price increases compared to average wages is also a factor in the rate cut. Villeroy de Galhau emphasized that the ECB's interest rate policy decision is independent of the Fed. Evidence shows that the ECB began to lower interest rates in early June, while the Fed lowered interest rates three months later. With the decline in inflation, we will be able to continue to lower interest rates. Currently, the market generally expects the ECB to cut interest rates by 25 basis points at the next meeting in December, but weaker data increases the possibility of a 50 basis point cut.

  • State Street warns Bitcoin craze could distract gold investors

    George Milling-Stanley, the head of gold strategy at Dominion Bank, warned that the rise of Bitcoin may mislead investors to overlook the stability of gold. He believes that Bitcoin is more like a return-driven investment, while gold provides long-term stability. He also criticized Bitcoin promoters for misleading the market by using the term "mining," and believes that gold is still a more reliable investment choice.

  • Rich Dad Poor Dad author strongly supports Michael Saylor’s BTC strategy

    Robert Kiyosaki, the author of "Rich Dad Poor Dad," expressed strong support for Bitcoin and Microstrategy CEO Michael Saylor's BTC strategy on X this week. Kiyosaki quoted Saylor's prediction that BTC would reach $13 million and said, "I believe he's right, he's a smart man." He also pointed out that if Saylor's prediction is correct, buying 0.01 BTC at today's price could potentially make investors millionaires in the future and advised to buy in a timely manner.