Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Signs That We Are In A Deep NFT Bear Market

If you’ve been reading my articles, you know I’m optimistic about NFTs for several reasons. Specifically, I believe it will lead to new applications, widespread adoption, and act as an invisible social layer.

However, a recent fiasco during the bank runs has cascaded into pain and fear among broader markets. NFT projects like Moonbirds, Doodles, and Clones have had a tough few weeks. Does this mean the end of these NFTs or an opportunity to buy in? It depends on your perspective.

While I believe in the latter, I don’t think you have to buy to participate. It’s fine to learn more as a participant or bystander. Purchasing NFTs can be profitable, but it involves a significant amount of risk, so I wouldn’t recommend it without thorough research.Why I Think We Are At The Worst Of The Bear Market

#1 Participants are at max fear, uncertainty, and doubt

I use the term FUD not to describe negativity, but rather to refer to a lack of clarity about how to proceed and what NFTs mean to people. What was once an enjoyable experience has become one that causes them pain and suffering, as they watch the floor prices continue to drop.

Some might argue that they entered for the wrong reasons, had flawed strategies, or had the wrong mindset. That’s a fair point, but I believe that the current uncertainty has resulted in irrational behavior, which signals that we are at the peak of the bear market.

#2 Founders are feeling the heat from the market participants

Leading a major NFT project comes with its highs and lows, which is to be expected. However, what was not expected was the reaction of the founders in some cases, particularly with regards to Moonbirds, Doodles, and CloneX. I won’t mention specific incidents, but you can either search for them on Twitter or take my word for it that some of the comments and tweets made by the founders should not have been publicized.

#3 Lost of sense of value

During the bull market, NFTs were often priced irrationally, with people spending large amounts on gas fees and new launches despite the lack of corresponding dollar value.

This may have been due to the free flow of money enabled by platforms like 3AC, Luna, and FTX. However, in the current bear market, many NFTs are undervalued despite their potential benefits, such as claiming physical items or leveraging 3D assets.

This is due to the basic law of supply and demand — NFT prices are simply a function of supply and demand, and the combined effect of lack of buying demand and increased selling pressure from the FUD is what is leading to these suppressed prices. This is a stark and opposite contrast to the overvaluation we see in bull markets.

But Should You Buy NFTs?

As mentioned above, believe it’s not necessary to invest in NFTs. Instead, I see NFTs as a way to leverage Ethereum. Regardless of whether ETH’s price increases or decreases, as long as my NFT can fetch a higher amount of ETH, it’s a win for me. Currently, I see an opportunity for this.

When considering which NFT to buy, there is no correct answer. It depends on your budget, risk tolerance, interests, and willingness to participate in the community. If you’re looking at it purely as an investment, it might be safer to go with the supposed “blue chip” NFTs, although they may not be entirely risk-free. If you are able to explore the potential applications of NFTs, in my opinion, there lies the greatest opportunity. By keeping up with daily updates, or lack thereof, you’ll be better equipped to make the best decision, whether it be buying or selling.

The Social Amplifying Effect Of NFTs

I must confess that I didn’t anticipate such a high level of pessimism in the current bear market. When I compare my experience from the last bear market to now, I believe that the social aspect of NFTs is the primary reason for this negativity.

The creation of a community and discussions around NFTs unintentionally amplifies the emotions of the crowd. This is why people act irrationally during the bull market and become overly negative during the bear market. It’s not necessarily bad, but it’s a characteristic of the NFT market.

Considering this, I reinforce my belief that the current NFT market is excessively negative and oversold. And I’m aware that my perspective comes from the privilege of having gone through a worse bear market in 2019 and having a long-term perspective toward NFTs. Unfortunately, not everyone shares this view.

I believe that NFTs, like cryptocurrencies, will transfer from weak hands to strong hands as they endure through market cycles. Strong hands are not necessarily those with financial power but those with conviction. I could be mistaken, but this is what I perceive, and I’m acting based on my knowledge and experience.

NFT
Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • U.S. Congressman Mike Flood: Looking forward to working with the next SEC Chairman to revoke the anti-crypto banking policy SAB 121

     US House of Representatives will investigate Representative Mike Flood's recent statement: "Despite widespread opposition, SAB 121 is still operating as a regulation, even though it has never gone through the normal Administrative Procedure Act process." Flood said, "I look forward to working with the next SEC chairman to revoke SAB 121. Whether Chairman Gary Gensler resigns on his own or President Trump fulfills his promise to dismiss Gensler, the new government has an excellent opportunity to usher in a new era after Gensler's departure." He added, "It's not surprising that Gensler opposed the digital asset regulatory framework passed by the House on a bipartisan basis earlier this year. 71 Democrats and House Republicans passed this common-sense framework together. Although the Democratic-led Senate rejected it, it represented a breakthrough moment for cryptocurrency and may provide information for the work of the unified Republican government when the next Congress begins in January next year."

  • Indian billionaire Adani summoned by US SEC to explain position on bribery case

    Indian billionaire Gautam Adani and his nephew, Sahil Adani, have been subpoenaed by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to explain allegations of paying over $250 million in bribes to win solar power contracts. According to the Press Trust of India (PTI), the subpoena has been delivered to the Adani family's residence in Ahmedabad, a city in western India, and they have been given 21 days to respond. The notice, issued on November 21 by the Eastern District Court of New York, states that if the Adani family fails to respond on time, a default judgment will be made against them.

  • U.S. Congressman: SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce may become the new acting chairman of the SEC

    US Congressman French Hill revealed at the North American Blockchain Summit (NABS) that Republican SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce is "likely" to become the new acting chair of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). He noted that current chair Gary Gensler will step down on January 20, 2025, and the Republican Party will take over the SEC, with Peirce expected to succeed him.

  • Tether spokesperson: The relationship with Cantor is purely business, and the claim that Lutnick influenced regulatory actions is pure nonsense

     a spokesperson for Tether stated: "The relationship between Tether and Cantor Fitzgerald is purely a business relationship based on managing reserves. Claims that Howard Lutnick's joining the transition team in some way implies an influence on regulatory actions are baseless."

  • Bitwise CEO warns that ETHW is not suitable for all investors and has high risks and high volatility

    Hunter Horsley, CEO of Bitwise, posted on X platform that he was happy to see capital inflows into Bitwise's Ethereum exchange-traded fund ETHW, iShares, and Fidelity this Friday. He reminded that ETHW is not a registered investment company under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940 and therefore is not protected by the law. ETHW is not suitable for all investors due to its high risk and volatility.

  • Musk said he liked the "WOULD" meme, and the related tokens rose 400 times in a short period of time

    Musk posted a picture on his social media platform saying he likes the "WOULD" meme. As a result, the meme coin with the same name briefly surged. According to GMGN data, the meme coin with the same name created 123 days ago surged over 400 times in a short period of time, with a current market value of 4.5 million US dollars. Reminder to users: Meme coins have no practical use cases, prices are highly volatile, and investment should be cautious.

  • Victory Securities: Funding Rates halved and fell, Bitcoin's short-term direction is not one-sided

    Zhou Lele, the Vice Chief Operating Officer of Victory Securities, analyzed that the macro and high-level negative impact risks in the cryptocurrency market have passed. The risks are now more focused on expected realization, such as the American entrepreneur Musk and the American "Efficiency Department" (DOGE) led by Ramaswamy. After media reports, the increase in Dogecoin ($DOGE) was only 5.7%, while Dogecoin rose by 83% in the week when the US election results were announced. Last week, the net inflow of off-exchange Bitcoin ETF was US$1.67 billion, and the holdings of exchange contracts and CME contracts remained high, but the funding rates halved and fell back, indicating that the direction of Bitcoin in the short term is not one-sided, and bears are also accumulating strength.

  • Careers in Crypto: 5 Insights for 2024

    In an overwhelming job market, leaning into personal networks and connections are more important than ever. Emily Landon, CEO of The Crypto Recruiters, outlines what is happening in the crypto job market and how you can position yourself or your company in 2024.

  • Cointime August 10th News Express

    1. The U.S. Internal Revenue Service has released a new draft of the crypto tax form, which no longer requires filling in wallet addresses and transaction IDs

  • Adidas and Doodles collaborate to launch a limited edition NFT collection pack

    Sportswear giant Adidas is collaborating with Ethereum NFT series Doodles to sell virtual gift packages that support buyers in purchasing exclusive physical clothing. Adidas and Doodles stated in a joint statement that these limited edition collectible packages will be available for purchase before August 16th, with two items in each package. The Adidas Originals x Doodles online store shows that the retail price for a single package is $4.99, while the price for 2 to 100 packages ranges from $8.49 to $374.99.Some joint sets include physical collectibles featuring Deysi, the digital mascot in Pharrell Williams and Coi Leray's new song "Not in the Store". These collectibles include Deysi sportswear and Superstar shoes, with each limited to 200 pieces.